Small Tipper Referenda 500 - 599
| Number | 538 |
| Title | Polkadot SDK PR #3453nomination-pools: add permissionless condition to chill |
| Proponent | Parity Tip Bot |
| Amount | 80 DOT |
| Vote | 🟢 Aye @ 6.01M DOT |
| Comments | Parity Tip Bot proposals are initiated by the Polkadot SDK core development team as a result of approved contributions to the Polkadot SDK codebase. Initiation of this tip happened here. |
| Number | 543 |
| Title | Retroactive Small Tips for Content (February) |
| Proponent | Pitcoin |
| Amount | 0.00000002 DOT ❗ Original request is 200 DOT, proponent entered 200 planck |
| Vote | 🔴 Nay @ 6.01M DOT |
| Comments | Hello @Pitcoin, I went through your content, and while reading I started thinking that the articles were lacking structure. Each article felt like being exposed to flashes of sentences and memey images rather than a well-structured article that streams information. Also, there are too many images in your articles. But then I noticed that the articles are actually just your X threads copied and pasted one after another. Which brings me to, you state that you are asking for funds for 14 pieces of content, but in reality this is only 7 pieces of content, duplicated on X and Polkaverse. Amount asked is not a lot, and I find effort valuable. but I don’t find it integral that you’re inflating your content count. Nay from me. PS#1 If it was not about the integrity of the proposal, I would still think twice before granting ~250USD (200DOT * 9USD / 7) per each of your content. PS#2 I find your efforts valuable, but you should work more on your content. There should be more to it than flashing tweets in a thread. kukabi | Helikon link |
| Number | 571 |
| Title | Polkadot SDK PR #3471 removed pallet::getter usage from cumulus pallets |
| Proponent | Parity Tip Bot |
| Amount | 20 DOT |
| Vote | 🟢 Aye @ 6.01M DOT |
| Comments | Parity Tip Bot proposals are initiated by the Polkadot SDK core development team as a result of approved contributions to the Polkadot SDK codebase. Initiation of this tip happened here. |
| Number | 578 |
| Title | Polkadot SDK PR #3371 removed pallet::getter usage from example pallets |
| Proponent | Parity Tip Bot |
| Amount | 20 DOT |
| Vote | 🟢 Aye @ 6.01M DOT |
| Comments | Parity Tip Bot proposals are initiated by the Polkadot SDK core development team as a result of approved contributions to the Polkadot SDK codebase. Initiation of this tip happened here. |
| Number | 579 |
| Title | Polkadot SDK PR #3456 removed pallet::getter usage from example pallet-collective |
| Proponent | Parity Tip Bot |
| Amount | 20 DOT |
| Vote | 🟢 Aye @ 6.01M DOT |
| Comments | Parity Tip Bot proposals are initiated by the Polkadot SDK core development team as a result of approved contributions to the Polkadot SDK codebase. Initiation of this tip happened here. |